If, in the City`s sole discretion, pre-service of the land has not been completed to the satisfaction of the City at the City`s sole discretion, the City may request the developer to return the land to its original condition, or may do so itself using titles published under this Agreement, or can rely on this guarantee; provide services in accordance with plans and specifications. (11) The Developer agrees that, at the request of the City, the Developer may perform, perform, perform or cause to be performed all other acts, acts, things, devices and legal representations in order to ensure the full implementation of the terms, conditions and conditions of this Contract and to achieve the intentions of the parties set forth herein. The proponent obtained permission from the municipality to begin preparing the site prior to entering into the subdivision agreement. In this case, this will include: (c) In attempting to submit this agreement to the Council, an appropriate and democratic procedure has been completely rejected. Developer acknowledges and agrees that, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, no prior maintenance is permitted with respect to the Services, if necessary, located outside the countries, unless CityEngineer`s prior written consent is obtained. Subject to the foregoing, all such external services will be created pursuant to a subdivision agreement and only after the subdivision agreement on the ownership of the land has been registered and all titles required under that agreement have been filed with the city. 7) The “City Attorney`s Agreement” states in Schedule C that $100,000 is sufficient security to restore what was currently destroyed. My model is that it should be $500,000 if there is an early agreement. If reasonably expected, these funds should be used to “restore the country if development does not progress”. The fact that the municipality must take a firm stand in this matter is reflected in the bad faith shown by the developer in destroying the foliage without authorization. 2) The agreement proposed by the “city attorney” was distributed to two people in my community, as far as I know, there were between 7 and 8 days to respond to these two people. There is a strange coincidence to this event. On 3./98.
In November, my lawyer and I went to the municipal offices to find out what was happening on the ghost land. That night, I received a copy in the mailbox with the agreement and cover letter of November 3/98. The letter from the “city`s lawyer” was dated “28/98 October”. Is it possible that no member of the community would have received notification of this agreement if I had not investigated the matter? No municipal employees were aware of what had happened. However, my lawyer and I were informed by an employee that they had received a call from a concerned neighbor the day before. (4) In view of the above, why should the “city attorney” be motivated to protect municipal interests in order to reach an agreement that would result in premature or totally unnecessary destruction of the environment? The Citysolicitor states that this is a “common practice”. It is my understanding that when communities in very suburban areas where a significant number of subdivisions are built enter into premature site plans, the impact is low when there is little existing housing. This is in contradiction with the current situation of a mature neighborhood, which is negatively affected by this development. He says it will “protect municipal interests.” It is true that this agreement must be concluded as a condition of the agreement, but why must it be premature? “The city`s lawyer” then claimed that a quick agreement would be reached “to restore the land. in the event that there is no development.
If there were no premature destruction, there would be no need for any form of restoration. In short, the “city attorney” provided no credible reason to reach a quick deal. (e) The amount proposed in the agreement is not sufficient to restore what was illegally removed in the form of foliage. a) The Letter of Credit is a guarantee for all of the Developer`s obligations under the terms of this Agreement, without limitation; (20) Subject to limitations on assignment by Developer, this Agreement serves and binds the respective successors and assigns of each party. .